All
Images
Videos
News
Maps
English (New Zealand)
čeština
Dansk
Deutsch (Deutschland)
Deutsch (Österreich)
Eesti
English (Australia)
English (Canada)
English (Cyprus)
English (India)
English (Ireland)
English (New Zealand)
English (Phillipines)
English (Singapore)
English (UK)
English (US)
Español (Argentina)
Español (Chile)
Español (Colombia)
Español (España)
Español (México)
Español (Perú)
Español (Venezuela)
français (Belgique)
français (France)
Hrvatski
italiano
latviešu valoda
Lëtzebuergesch
lietuvių kalba
limba română
magyar
Malti
Nederlands
Norsk
polski
português (Brazil)
português (Portugal)
Schwyzerdütsch
slovenčina
slovenščina
Suomi
Svenska
tiếng việt
ελληνικά
български
ภาษาไทย
中文 (台灣)
中文 (香港)
한국어
日本語
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa melayu
Anytime
Anytime
Past Day
Past Week
Past Month
SafeSearch: On
On
Off
News Search is powered by Bing, which is subject to the
Microsoft Privacy Statement
. No personal information is sent to Microsoft.
The New York Times
Too Red, Too Vampiric, Too Sexy: A Brief History of Polarizing Royal Portraits
Jonathan Yeo’s painting of King Charles III has prompted both admiration and bemusement, but it’s far from the first royal portrait to divide opinion.
3 weeks ago
Seattle Times
Too vampiric, too sexy: A brief history of polarizing royal portraits
With some artworks, critics objected royals were too gloomy, too naked, or, in the case of King Charles III’s latest portrait, too red.
2 weeks ago
Next >
Privacy
Terms
About